ConceptComplete

Regulators and Special Values of L-Functions

Regulators are maps from algebraic K-theory to real-valued cohomology theories that measure the "transcendental" part of K-groups. The Beilinson conjectures predict that the regulators compute special values of L-functions, providing the deepest known connection between algebra and analysis.


The Borel regulator

Definition6.6Borel regulator

For a number field FF with ring of integers OF\mathcal{O}_F, the Borel regulator is a map

rBorel:K2nβˆ’1(OF)β†’Rdnr_{\text{Borel}}: K_{2n-1}(\mathcal{O}_F) \to \mathbb{R}^{d_n}

where dn={r1+r2nΒ oddr2nΒ evend_n = \begin{cases} r_1 + r_2 & n \text{ odd} \\ r_2 & n \text{ even} \end{cases} (r1r_1 = real places, r2r_2 = complex places).

The map is defined via the van Est isomorphism: the inclusion GLN(OF)β†ͺGLN(FβŠ—QR)=βˆΟƒGLN(RΒ orΒ C)GL_N(\mathcal{O}_F) \hookrightarrow GL_N(F \otimes_\mathbb{Q} \mathbb{R}) = \prod_\sigma GL_N(\mathbb{R} \text{ or } \mathbb{C}) induces maps on group cohomology. The Borel regulator is the composition:

K2nβˆ’1(OF)β†’H2nβˆ’1(GL(OF);Z)β†’H2nβˆ’1(GL(R)r1Γ—GL(C)r2;R)β†’RdnK_{2n-1}(\mathcal{O}_F) \to H_{2n-1}(GL(\mathcal{O}_F); \mathbb{Z}) \to H_{2n-1}(GL(\mathbb{R})^{r_1} \times GL(\mathbb{C})^{r_2}; \mathbb{R}) \to \mathbb{R}^{d_n}

where the last map uses the continuous cohomology class corresponding to the Borel class b2nβˆ’1∈Hc2nβˆ’1(GL(R);R)b_{2n-1} \in H^{2n-1}_c(GL(\mathbb{R}); \mathbb{R}).

Theorem6.3Borel's theorem

The image of rBorel:K2nβˆ’1(OF)βŠ—Rβ†’Rdnr_{\text{Borel}}: K_{2n-1}(\mathcal{O}_F) \otimes \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^{d_n} is a lattice of rank dnd_n. The Borel regulator Rn(F)R_n(F) is the covolume of this lattice:

Rn(F)=vol⁑(Rdn/rBorel(K2nβˆ’1(OF)free)).R_n(F) = \operatorname{vol}(\mathbb{R}^{d_n} / r_{\text{Borel}}(K_{2n-1}(\mathcal{O}_F)_{\text{free}})).

This is well-defined up to a rational number. For n=1n = 1: K1(OF)=OFΓ—K_1(\mathcal{O}_F) = \mathcal{O}_F^{\times} and R1(F)R_1(F) is the classical regulator RFR_F from the Dirichlet unit theorem, up to a rational factor.


The Beilinson conjectures

Definition6.7Beilinson regulator

For a smooth projective variety XX over Q\mathbb{Q}, Beilinson defines a regulator map from motivic cohomology to Deligne cohomology:

rD:Hmotn(X,Q(p))β†’HDn(X/R,R(p))r_\mathcal{D}: H^n_{\text{mot}}(X, \mathbb{Q}(p)) \to H^n_\mathcal{D}(X/\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R}(p))

where Deligne cohomology HDnH^n_\mathcal{D} is a real-valued cohomology theory combining Hodge theory and de Rham cohomology:

HDn(X/R,R(p))=Hn(X(C),R(p)β†’Ξ©X0β†’β‹―β†’Ξ©Xpβˆ’1)H^n_\mathcal{D}(X/\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R}(p)) = H^n(X(\mathbb{C}), \mathbb{R}(p) \to \Omega^0_X \to \cdots \to \Omega^{p-1}_X)

(the hypercohomology of the Deligne complex).

For X=Spec⁑OFX = \operatorname{Spec} \mathcal{O}_F and the weight-(2nβˆ’1,n)(2n-1, n) part: rDr_\mathcal{D} coincides with the Borel regulator on K2nβˆ’1(OF)K_{2n-1}(\mathcal{O}_F).

RemarkBeilinson's conjectures

Beilinson's conjecture (1984) predicts, for a smooth projective variety X/QX/\mathbb{Q} and its LL-function L(Hi(X),s)L(H^i(X), s):

  1. The order of vanishing of L(Hi(X),s)L(H^i(X), s) at s=ms = m (an integer ≀i/2\leq i/2) equals the rank of the motivic cohomology group Hmoti+1(X,Q(i+1βˆ’m))H^{i+1}_{\text{mot}}(X, \mathbb{Q}(i+1-m)).

  2. The leading coefficient of L(Hi(X),s)L(H^i(X), s) at s=ms = m is given (up to a rational number) by the determinant of the Beilinson regulator matrix:

Lβˆ—(Hi(X),m)∼QΓ—det⁑(rD:Hmoti+1(X,Q(i+1βˆ’m))β†’HDi+1(X/R,R(i+1βˆ’m))).L^*(H^i(X), m) \sim_{\mathbb{Q}^{\times}} \det(r_\mathcal{D}: H^{i+1}_{\text{mot}}(X, \mathbb{Q}(i+1-m)) \to H^{i+1}_\mathcal{D}(X/\mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R}(i+1-m))).

This vastly generalizes the analytic class number formula, Dirichlet's class number formula, and the Birch--Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture.


Known cases

ExampleThe Dirichlet regulator (n = 1)

For n=1n = 1, X=Spec⁑OFX = \operatorname{Spec} \mathcal{O}_F: K1(OF)=OFΓ—K_1(\mathcal{O}_F) = \mathcal{O}_F^{\times}, and the Beilinson regulator is the logarithmic embedding:

rD:OFΓ—βŠ—Rβ†’Rr1+r2βˆ’1,u↦(logβ‘βˆ£Οƒi(u)∣)ir_\mathcal{D}: \mathcal{O}_F^{\times} \otimes \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^{r_1 + r_2 - 1}, \quad u \mapsto (\log|\sigma_i(u)|)_i

where Οƒi\sigma_i are the archimedean embeddings. The covolume R1(F)=RFR_1(F) = R_F is the Dirichlet regulator. The class number formula:

lim⁑sβ†’1(sβˆ’1)ΞΆF(s)=2r1(2Ο€)r2RFhFwF∣dF∣\lim_{s \to 1} (s-1) \zeta_F(s) = \frac{2^{r_1}(2\pi)^{r_2} R_F h_F}{w_F \sqrt{|d_F|}}

expresses ΞΆFβˆ—(1)\zeta_F^*(1) in terms of the regulator, class number hFh_F, roots of unity wFw_F, and discriminant dFd_F. This is the archetype for all Beilinson conjectures.

ExampleBorel regulator for K₃

For K3(OF)K_3(\mathcal{O}_F): the Borel regulator gives rBorel:K3(OF)βŠ—Rβ†’Rr2r_{\text{Borel}}: K_3(\mathcal{O}_F) \otimes \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^{r_2} (only complex places contribute for weight 2).

Zagier's conjecture (proved by Goncharov for K3K_3): the Borel regulator on K3(F)β‰…Zr2βŠ•(torsion)K_3(F) \cong \mathbb{Z}^{r_2} \oplus (\text{torsion}) is given by the Bloch--Wigner dilogarithm:

D(z)=Im⁑(Li⁑2(z))+arg⁑(1βˆ’z)log⁑∣z∣D(z) = \operatorname{Im}(\operatorname{Li}_2(z)) + \arg(1-z) \log|z|

applied to elements of the Bloch group B(F)β‰…K3ind(F)\mathcal{B}(F) \cong K_3^{\text{ind}}(F) (the indecomposable K3K_3). Specifically, for each complex embedding Οƒ:Fβ†ͺC\sigma: F \hookrightarrow \mathbb{C}:

rσ([z]2)=D(σ(z))r_\sigma([z]_2) = D(\sigma(z))

where [z]2∈B(F)[z]_2 \in \mathcal{B}(F) is the element corresponding to z∈Fβˆ–{0,1}z \in F \setminus \{0, 1\}.

This connects K3K_3 to hyperbolic geometry: D(z)D(z) is the volume of an ideal tetrahedron in H3\mathbb{H}^3 with cross-ratio zz, and ΢F(2)∼R2(F)\zeta_F(2) \sim R_2(F) via the Borel regulator.


The Birch--Swinnerton-Dyer connection

RemarkBSD as a special case of Beilinson

For an elliptic curve E/QE/\mathbb{Q}, the Birch--Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture is a special case of Beilinson's conjectures. Taking X=EX = E, i=1i = 1, m=1m = 1:

ord⁑s=1L(E,s)=rk⁑E(Q)=rk⁑Hmot2(E,Z(1))=rk⁑CH1(E,1)=rk⁑Pic⁑0(E)βŠ—Q\operatorname{ord}_{s=1} L(E, s) = \operatorname{rk} E(\mathbb{Q}) = \operatorname{rk} H^2_{\text{mot}}(E, \mathbb{Z}(1)) = \operatorname{rk} CH^1(E, 1) = \operatorname{rk} \operatorname{Pic}^0(E) \otimes \mathbb{Q}

Wait, more precisely: the relevant motivic cohomology group is Hmot1(E,Q(1))H^1_{\text{mot}}(E, \mathbb{Q}(1)), and the regulator is the Neron--Tate height pairing. The leading coefficient of L(E,s)L(E, s) at s=1s = 1 involves:

Lβˆ—(E,1)∼ΩEβ‹…REβ‹…βˆcpβ‹…βˆ£Sha⁑∣∣E(Q)tors∣2L^*(E, 1) \sim \frac{\Omega_E \cdot R_E \cdot \prod c_p \cdot |\operatorname{Sha}|}{|E(\mathbb{Q})_{\text{tors}}|^2}

where RER_E is the regulator (determinant of the height pairing matrix), ΩE\Omega_E is the real period, cpc_p are Tamagawa numbers, and Sha⁑\operatorname{Sha} is the Tate--Shafarevich group (conjectured finite).

The K-theoretic formulation packages all these invariants into a single regulator computation.