ConceptComplete

The Galois Symbol and Norm Residue Map

The norm residue homomorphism (or Galois symbol) connects Milnor K-theory to Galois cohomology. This map is the central object of the Bloch--Kato conjecture, now a theorem of Voevodsky and Rost, which provides a complete understanding of the relationship between symbols in K-theory and etale cohomology classes.


The Kummer map and Galois cohomology

Definition4.4Kummer theory and the norm residue symbol

For a field FF containing a primitive nn-th root of unity ΢n\zeta_n (with char⁑(F)∀n\operatorname{char}(F) \nmid n), the Kummer map is

βˆ‚:FΓ—β†’H1(GF,ΞΌn),a↦(σ↦σ(an)/an)\partial: F^{\times} \to H^1(G_F, \mu_n), \quad a \mapsto (\sigma \mapsto \sigma(\sqrt[n]{a}) / \sqrt[n]{a})

where GF=Gal⁑(Fsep/F)G_F = \operatorname{Gal}(F^{\mathrm{sep}}/F) is the absolute Galois group. This gives an isomorphism FΓ—/(FΓ—)nβ†’βˆΌH1(GF,ΞΌn)F^{\times} / (F^{\times})^n \xrightarrow{\sim} H^1(G_F, \mu_n) (Kummer theory).

The norm residue homomorphism (or Galois symbol) is the degree-mm extension:

hnm:KmM(F)/nβ†’Hm(GF,ΞΌnβŠ—m)h_n^m: K_m^M(F) / n \to H^m(G_F, \mu_n^{\otimes m})

defined by

hnm({a1,…,am})=βˆ‚(a1)βˆͺβ‹―βˆͺβˆ‚(am)h_n^m(\{a_1, \ldots, a_m\}) = \partial(a_1) \cup \cdots \cup \partial(a_m)

where βˆͺ\cup is the cup product in Galois cohomology.

RemarkWell-definedness

To verify hnmh_n^m is well-defined, one must check the Steinberg relation: for a∈Fβˆ–{0,1}a \in F \setminus \{0, 1\},

βˆ‚(a)βˆͺβˆ‚(1βˆ’a)=0∈H2(GF,ΞΌnβŠ—2).\partial(a) \cup \partial(1-a) = 0 \in H^2(G_F, \mu_n^{\otimes 2}).

The class βˆ‚(a)βˆͺβˆ‚(1βˆ’a)\partial(a) \cup \partial(1-a) corresponds to a central simple algebra (the cyclic algebra (a,1βˆ’a)n(a, 1-a)_n), and the Steinberg relation asserts this algebra is split. This can be verified: F(an)F(\sqrt[n]{a}) contains an nn-th root of 1βˆ’a1-a (since 1βˆ’a=1βˆ’a1 - a = 1 - a and the extension F(an)/FF(\sqrt[n]{a})/F splits the algebra).


Low-degree cases

ExampleDegree 1: Kummer theory

For m=1m = 1: hn1:K1M(F)/n=FΓ—/(FΓ—)nβ†’H1(GF,ΞΌn)h_n^1: K_1^M(F)/n = F^{\times}/(F^{\times})^n \to H^1(G_F, \mu_n) is the Kummer isomorphism. This is classical and holds for all nn with char⁑(F)∀n\operatorname{char}(F) \nmid n.

For F=QF = \mathbb{Q} and n=2n = 2: QΓ—/(QΓ—)2β‰…H1(GQ,ΞΌ2)\mathbb{Q}^{\times}/(\mathbb{Q}^{\times})^2 \cong H^1(G_\mathbb{Q}, \mu_2). The group QΓ—/(QΓ—)2\mathbb{Q}^{\times}/(\mathbb{Q}^{\times})^2 has generators {βˆ’1,2,3,5,7,…}\{-1, 2, 3, 5, 7, \ldots\} (sign and primes), and each corresponds to a quadratic extension Q(d)\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d}).

ExampleDegree 2: Brauer group

For m=2m = 2: hn2:K2M(F)/nβ†’H2(GF,ΞΌnβŠ—2)h_n^2: K_2^M(F)/n \to H^2(G_F, \mu_n^{\otimes 2}). When FF contains ΞΌn\mu_n, we have ΞΌnβŠ—2β‰…ΞΌn\mu_n^{\otimes 2} \cong \mu_n and H2(GF,ΞΌn)β‰…Br⁑(F)[n]H^2(G_F, \mu_n) \cong \operatorname{Br}(F)[n] (the nn-torsion in the Brauer group).

The map sends a symbol {a,b}\{a, b\} to the class of the cyclic algebra (a,b)n(a, b)_n: the FF-algebra generated by u,vu, v with un=au^n = a, vn=bv^n = b, vu=ΞΆnuvvu = \zeta_n uv.

The Merkurjev--Suslin theorem (1982): hn2h_n^2 is an isomorphism for all fields and all nn. This was a breakthrough, implying:

  • Br⁑(F)[n]\operatorname{Br}(F)[n] is generated by cyclic algebras (when ΞΌnβŠ‚F\mu_n \subset F).
  • K2(F)/nβ‰…Het2(F,ΞΌnβŠ—2)K_2(F)/n \cong H^2_{\text{et}}(F, \mu_n^{\otimes 2}).

The Bloch--Kato conjecture

Theorem4.1Bloch--Kato Conjecture (Voevodsky--Rost)

For any field FF and any positive integer nn with char⁑(F)∀n\operatorname{char}(F) \nmid n, the norm residue homomorphism

hnm:KmM(F)/nβ†’β€…β€ŠβˆΌβ€…β€ŠHm(GF,ΞΌnβŠ—m)h_n^m: K_m^M(F)/n \xrightarrow{\;\sim\;} H^m(G_F, \mu_n^{\otimes m})

is an isomorphism for all mβ‰₯0m \geq 0.

RemarkHistory and proof

The proof of the Bloch--Kato conjecture was achieved through the work of many mathematicians over several decades:

  1. m=1m = 1: Classical (Kummer theory).
  2. m=2m = 2: Merkurjev--Suslin (1982) for all nn; Merkurjev (1981) for n=2n = 2.
  3. n=2n = 2, all mm: Voevodsky (1996--2003), using motivic cohomology and the Steenrod algebra. This is the Milnor conjecture, for which Voevodsky received the Fields Medal.
  4. nn odd prime, all mm: Voevodsky with Rost's chain lemma (2008--2011). The proof uses:
    • Motivic cohomology and its relationship to Milnor K-theory (KmM(F)β‰…Hmotm(F,Z(m))K_m^M(F) \cong H^m_{\text{mot}}(F, \mathbb{Z}(m))).
    • The motivic Steenrod algebra and its operations.
    • Norm varieties and Rost's degree formula.
    • Reduction steps via Rost's chain lemma.
  5. General nn: Follows from the prime power cases by a formal argument.

Consequences

ExampleConsequences of Bloch--Kato

The Bloch--Kato conjecture (theorem) has profound consequences:

  1. Galois cohomology computation: Hm(GF,ΞΌnβŠ—m)H^m(G_F, \mu_n^{\otimes m}) is computed by explicit symbols {a1,…,am}\{a_1, \ldots, a_m\}. No "exotic" cohomology classes exist.

  2. Quadratic forms: Milnor's conjecture relating Kβˆ—M(F)/2K_*^M(F)/2, the graded Witt ring Iβˆ—/Iβˆ—+1I^*/I^{*+1}, and Hβˆ—(F,Z/2)H^*(F, \mathbb{Z}/2) follows as a corollary.

  3. Higher class field theory: For a local field FF of residue characteristic pp and β„“β‰ p\ell \neq p:

KnM(F)/β„“β‰…Hn(GF,ΞΌβ„“βŠ—n)β‰…{Z/β„“n=0,1ΞΌβ„“(F)β‰…Z/gcd⁑(β„“,qβˆ’1)n=20nβ‰₯3K_n^M(F)/\ell \cong H^n(G_F, \mu_\ell^{\otimes n}) \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb{Z}/\ell & n = 0, 1 \\ \mu_\ell(F) \cong \mathbb{Z}/\gcd(\ell, q-1) & n = 2 \\ 0 & n \geq 3 \end{cases}

where the vanishing for nβ‰₯3n \geq 3 follows from the cohomological dimension cd⁑ℓ(GF)=2\operatorname{cd}_\ell(G_F) = 2.

  1. Lichtenbaum conjectures: The etale K-theory of number rings is related to special values of zeta functions, with the Bloch--Kato conjecture providing the comparison between algebraic and etale K-theory.