ConceptComplete

Localization Sequence

The localization sequence is the most important computational tool in algebraic K-theory. It relates the K-groups of a ring (or scheme) to those of a localization and the "fiber" at the removed points, producing a long exact sequence analogous to the Mayer--Vietoris sequence in topology.


Localization for abelian categories

Theorem3.1Quillen's Localization Theorem

Let A\mathcal{A} be an abelian category and BA\mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal{A} a Serre subcategory (closed under subobjects, quotients, and extensions). Let A/B\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B} be the Serre quotient category. Then there is a long exact sequence

Kn+1(A/B)Kn(B)Kn(A)Kn(A/B)Kn1(B)\cdots \to K_{n+1}(\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B}) \xrightarrow{\partial} K_n(\mathcal{B}) \to K_n(\mathcal{A}) \to K_n(\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B}) \xrightarrow{\partial} K_{n-1}(\mathcal{B}) \to \cdots

extending to the left indefinitely and terminating on the right:

K0(B)K0(A)K0(A/B)0.\cdots \to K_0(\mathcal{B}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B}) \to 0.


Localization for rings

Definition3.1Localization sequence for rings

Let RR be a Dedekind domain with fraction field FF. Let MS(R)\mathcal{M}_S(R) denote the category of finitely generated RR-modules supported on a set of primes SS. For a non-zero prime p\mathfrak{p}, devissage gives Kn(M{p}(R))Kn(R/p)K_n(\mathcal{M}_{\{\mathfrak{p}\}}(R)) \cong K_n(R/\mathfrak{p}).

The localization sequence takes the form:

Kn+1(F)pKn(R/p)Gn(R)Kn(F)pKn1(R/p)\cdots \to K_{n+1}(F) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_{\mathfrak{p}} K_n(R/\mathfrak{p}) \to G_n(R) \to K_n(F) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_{\mathfrak{p}} K_{n-1}(R/\mathfrak{p}) \to \cdots

where the direct sum is over all non-zero primes p\mathfrak{p} of RR, and \partial is the boundary map (or tame symbol in low degrees).

ExampleLocalization sequence for ℤ

For R=ZR = \mathbb{Z}, F=QF = \mathbb{Q}, and residue fields Fp\mathbb{F}_p:

Kn+1(Q)pKn(Fp)Gn(Z)Kn(Q)\cdots \to K_{n+1}(\mathbb{Q}) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_p K_n(\mathbb{F}_p) \to G_n(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_n(\mathbb{Q}) \to \cdots

Since Z\mathbb{Z} is regular, Gn(Z)=Kn(Z)G_n(\mathbb{Z}) = K_n(\mathbb{Z}). In low degrees:

n=0n = 0: K1(Q)pK0(Fp)K0(Z)K0(Q)0K_1(\mathbb{Q}) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_p K_0(\mathbb{F}_p) \to K_0(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_0(\mathbb{Q}) \to 0

This gives Q×vppZZZ0\mathbb{Q}^{\times} \xrightarrow{v_p} \bigoplus_p \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z} \to 0, where vpv_p is the pp-adic valuation. The cokernel of \partial is Z\mathbb{Z} (the class group of Z\mathbb{Z} is trivial).

n=1n = 1: K2(Q)pFp×K1(Z)K1(Q)K_2(\mathbb{Q}) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \to K_1(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_1(\mathbb{Q})

The tame symbol {a,b}=(1)vp(a)vp(b)avp(b)bvp(a)modp\partial\{a, b\} = (-1)^{v_p(a)v_p(b)} a^{v_p(b)} b^{-v_p(a)} \mod p. The sequence gives pFp×{±1}Q×\bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \to \{\pm 1\} \to \mathbb{Q}^{\times} which is pFp×(1)?{±1}\bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \xrightarrow{(-1)^?} \{\pm 1\}, the product of signs.


Localization for schemes

Definition3.2Localization for schemes

For a Noetherian scheme XX with closed subscheme ZXZ \hookrightarrow X and open complement U=XZU = X \setminus Z, there is a long exact sequence in G-theory:

Gn+1(U)Gn(Z)iGn(X)jGn(U)Gn1(Z)\cdots \to G_{n+1}(U) \xrightarrow{\partial} G_n(Z) \xrightarrow{i_*} G_n(X) \xrightarrow{j^*} G_n(U) \xrightarrow{\partial} G_{n-1}(Z) \to \cdots

where i:ZXi: Z \hookrightarrow X is the closed immersion and j:UXj: U \hookrightarrow X is the open immersion. The map jj^* is restriction of coherent sheaves, and ii_* is pushforward.

ExampleG-theory of the affine line

Consider X=Ak1=Speck[t]X = \mathbb{A}^1_k = \operatorname{Spec} k[t], Z={0}=SpeckZ = \{0\} = \operatorname{Spec} k, U=Ak1{0}=Speck[t,t1]U = \mathbb{A}^1_k \setminus \{0\} = \operatorname{Spec} k[t, t^{-1}]:

Gn+1(k[t,t1])Gn(k)Gn(k[t])Gn(k[t,t1])\cdots \to G_{n+1}(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to G_n(k) \to G_n(k[t]) \to G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to \cdots

Since k[t]k[t] is regular, Gn(k[t])=Kn(k[t])=Kn(k)G_n(k[t]) = K_n(k[t]) = K_n(k) by homotopy invariance. The sequence becomes:

Gn+1(k[t,t1])Kn(k)Kn(k)Gn(k[t,t1])\cdots \to G_{n+1}(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to K_n(k) \to K_n(k) \to G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to \cdots

The map Kn(k)Kn(k)K_n(k) \to K_n(k) factors as Kn(k)Kn(k[t])t=0Kn(k)K_n(k) \to K_n(k[t]) \xrightarrow{t=0} K_n(k), which is the identity. So the connecting map is zero, and we get short exact sequences 0Kn(k)Gn(k[t,t1])Kn1(k)00 \to K_n(k) \to G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to K_{n-1}(k) \to 0. These split, giving

Gn(k[t,t1])Kn(k)Kn1(k)G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \cong K_n(k) \oplus K_{n-1}(k)

which is the BHS decomposition for regular rings.


The boundary map

RemarkThe boundary map as a residue

The boundary map :Kn(F)Kn1(k)\partial: K_n(F) \to K_{n-1}(k) in the localization sequence for a DVR (R,m,k,F)(R, \mathfrak{m}, k, F) generalizes classical residue maps:

  • n=1n = 1: :K1(F)=F×K0(k)=Z\partial: K_1(F) = F^{\times} \to K_0(k) = \mathbb{Z} is the valuation v:F×Zv: F^{\times} \to \mathbb{Z}.

  • n=2n = 2: :K2(F)K1(k)=k×\partial: K_2(F) \to K_1(k) = k^{\times} is the tame symbol: {a,b}=(1)v(a)v(b)av(b)bv(a)modm\partial\{a, b\} = (-1)^{v(a)v(b)} \frac{a^{v(b)}}{b^{v(a)}} \mod \mathfrak{m}.

  • Higher nn: \partial is a "higher tame symbol" that can be described in terms of Milnor K-theory or motivic cohomology.

The exactness of the localization sequence at Kn(F)K_n(F) means: an element αKn(F)\alpha \in K_n(F) lies in the image of Kn(R)Kn(F)K_n(R) \to K_n(F) (i.e., has "no pole" at p\mathfrak{p}) if and only if p(α)=0\partial_\mathfrak{p}(\alpha) = 0.