ConceptComplete

Localization Sequence

The localization sequence is the most important computational tool in algebraic K-theory. It relates the K-groups of a ring (or scheme) to those of a localization and the "fiber" at the removed points, producing a long exact sequence analogous to the Mayer--Vietoris sequence in topology.


Localization for abelian categories

Theorem3.1Quillen's Localization Theorem

Let A\mathcal{A} be an abelian category and B⊆A\mathcal{B} \subseteq \mathcal{A} a Serre subcategory (closed under subobjects, quotients, and extensions). Let A/B\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B} be the Serre quotient category. Then there is a long exact sequence

⋯→Kn+1(A/B)→∂Kn(B)→Kn(A)→Kn(A/B)→∂Kn−1(B)→⋯\cdots \to K_{n+1}(\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B}) \xrightarrow{\partial} K_n(\mathcal{B}) \to K_n(\mathcal{A}) \to K_n(\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B}) \xrightarrow{\partial} K_{n-1}(\mathcal{B}) \to \cdots

extending to the left indefinitely and terminating on the right:

⋯→K0(B)→K0(A)→K0(A/B)→0.\cdots \to K_0(\mathcal{B}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A}) \to K_0(\mathcal{A}/\mathcal{B}) \to 0.


Localization for rings

Definition3.1Localization sequence for rings

Let RR be a Dedekind domain with fraction field FF. Let MS(R)\mathcal{M}_S(R) denote the category of finitely generated RR-modules supported on a set of primes SS. For a non-zero prime p\mathfrak{p}, devissage gives Kn(M{p}(R))≅Kn(R/p)K_n(\mathcal{M}_{\{\mathfrak{p}\}}(R)) \cong K_n(R/\mathfrak{p}).

The localization sequence takes the form:

⋯→Kn+1(F)→∂⨁pKn(R/p)→Gn(R)→Kn(F)→∂⨁pKn−1(R/p)→⋯\cdots \to K_{n+1}(F) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_{\mathfrak{p}} K_n(R/\mathfrak{p}) \to G_n(R) \to K_n(F) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_{\mathfrak{p}} K_{n-1}(R/\mathfrak{p}) \to \cdots

where the direct sum is over all non-zero primes p\mathfrak{p} of RR, and ∂\partial is the boundary map (or tame symbol in low degrees).

ExampleLocalization sequence for ℤ

For R=ZR = \mathbb{Z}, F=QF = \mathbb{Q}, and residue fields Fp\mathbb{F}_p:

⋯→Kn+1(Q)→∂⨁pKn(Fp)→Gn(Z)→Kn(Q)→⋯\cdots \to K_{n+1}(\mathbb{Q}) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_p K_n(\mathbb{F}_p) \to G_n(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_n(\mathbb{Q}) \to \cdots

Since Z\mathbb{Z} is regular, Gn(Z)=Kn(Z)G_n(\mathbb{Z}) = K_n(\mathbb{Z}). In low degrees:

n=0n = 0: K1(Q)→∂⨁pK0(Fp)→K0(Z)→K0(Q)→0K_1(\mathbb{Q}) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_p K_0(\mathbb{F}_p) \to K_0(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_0(\mathbb{Q}) \to 0

This gives Q×→vp⨁pZ→Z→Z→0\mathbb{Q}^{\times} \xrightarrow{v_p} \bigoplus_p \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z} \to 0, where vpv_p is the pp-adic valuation. The cokernel of ∂\partial is Z\mathbb{Z} (the class group of Z\mathbb{Z} is trivial).

n=1n = 1: K2(Q)→∂⨁pFp×→K1(Z)→K1(Q)K_2(\mathbb{Q}) \xrightarrow{\partial} \bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \to K_1(\mathbb{Z}) \to K_1(\mathbb{Q})

The tame symbol ∂{a,b}=(−1)vp(a)vp(b)avp(b)b−vp(a)mod  p\partial\{a, b\} = (-1)^{v_p(a)v_p(b)} a^{v_p(b)} b^{-v_p(a)} \mod p. The sequence gives ⨁pFp×→{±1}→Q×\bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \to \{\pm 1\} \to \mathbb{Q}^{\times} which is ⨁pFp×→(−1)?{±1}\bigoplus_p \mathbb{F}_p^{\times} \xrightarrow{(-1)^?} \{\pm 1\}, the product of signs.


Localization for schemes

Definition3.2Localization for schemes

For a Noetherian scheme XX with closed subscheme Z↪XZ \hookrightarrow X and open complement U=X∖ZU = X \setminus Z, there is a long exact sequence in G-theory:

⋯→Gn+1(U)→∂Gn(Z)→i∗Gn(X)→j∗Gn(U)→∂Gn−1(Z)→⋯\cdots \to G_{n+1}(U) \xrightarrow{\partial} G_n(Z) \xrightarrow{i_*} G_n(X) \xrightarrow{j^*} G_n(U) \xrightarrow{\partial} G_{n-1}(Z) \to \cdots

where i:Z↪Xi: Z \hookrightarrow X is the closed immersion and j:U↪Xj: U \hookrightarrow X is the open immersion. The map j∗j^* is restriction of coherent sheaves, and i∗i_* is pushforward.

ExampleG-theory of the affine line

Consider X=Ak1=Spec⁡k[t]X = \mathbb{A}^1_k = \operatorname{Spec} k[t], Z={0}=Spec⁡kZ = \{0\} = \operatorname{Spec} k, U=Ak1∖{0}=Spec⁡k[t,t−1]U = \mathbb{A}^1_k \setminus \{0\} = \operatorname{Spec} k[t, t^{-1}]:

⋯→Gn+1(k[t,t−1])→Gn(k)→Gn(k[t])→Gn(k[t,t−1])→⋯\cdots \to G_{n+1}(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to G_n(k) \to G_n(k[t]) \to G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to \cdots

Since k[t]k[t] is regular, Gn(k[t])=Kn(k[t])=Kn(k)G_n(k[t]) = K_n(k[t]) = K_n(k) by homotopy invariance. The sequence becomes:

⋯→Gn+1(k[t,t−1])→Kn(k)→Kn(k)→Gn(k[t,t−1])→⋯\cdots \to G_{n+1}(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to K_n(k) \to K_n(k) \to G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to \cdots

The map Kn(k)→Kn(k)K_n(k) \to K_n(k) factors as Kn(k)→Kn(k[t])→t=0Kn(k)K_n(k) \to K_n(k[t]) \xrightarrow{t=0} K_n(k), which is the identity. So the connecting map is zero, and we get short exact sequences 0→Kn(k)→Gn(k[t,t−1])→Kn−1(k)→00 \to K_n(k) \to G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \to K_{n-1}(k) \to 0. These split, giving

Gn(k[t,t−1])≅Kn(k)⊕Kn−1(k)G_n(k[t, t^{-1}]) \cong K_n(k) \oplus K_{n-1}(k)

which is the BHS decomposition for regular rings.


The boundary map

RemarkThe boundary map as a residue

The boundary map ∂:Kn(F)→Kn−1(k)\partial: K_n(F) \to K_{n-1}(k) in the localization sequence for a DVR (R,m,k,F)(R, \mathfrak{m}, k, F) generalizes classical residue maps:

  • n=1n = 1: ∂:K1(F)=F×→K0(k)=Z\partial: K_1(F) = F^{\times} \to K_0(k) = \mathbb{Z} is the valuation v:F×→Zv: F^{\times} \to \mathbb{Z}.

  • n=2n = 2: ∂:K2(F)→K1(k)=k×\partial: K_2(F) \to K_1(k) = k^{\times} is the tame symbol: ∂{a,b}=(−1)v(a)v(b)av(b)bv(a)mod  m\partial\{a, b\} = (-1)^{v(a)v(b)} \frac{a^{v(b)}}{b^{v(a)}} \mod \mathfrak{m}.

  • Higher nn: ∂\partial is a "higher tame symbol" that can be described in terms of Milnor K-theory or motivic cohomology.

The exactness of the localization sequence at Kn(F)K_n(F) means: an element α∈Kn(F)\alpha \in K_n(F) lies in the image of Kn(R)→Kn(F)K_n(R) \to K_n(F) (i.e., has "no pole" at p\mathfrak{p}) if and only if ∂p(α)=0\partial_\mathfrak{p}(\alpha) = 0.